2016 Nissan Note: MOT pass rate and common faults
Share of initial MOT tests passed with no repairs. Repairs made at the test centre count as a fail. 95% range 81.2% to 82.6% (±0.8 points).
That is 7.0 points above the average for all vehicles first used in 2016 (74.9%). These cars were about 9 years old at the test.
Check a specific Note
Failure areas compared with all 2016 vehicles
Compared with all vehicles first used in 2016, less common in suspension (0.8×), lights and electrics (0.6×), tyres (0.6×), windscreen, wipers, mirrors (0.9×), brakes (0.6×) and noise, emissions, leaks (0.7×). Other differences are within the margin of error.
- Suspension5.6 in 100 tests0.8× compared with 7.4 in 100 for all vehicles first used in 2016
- Lights and electrics4.6 in 100 tests0.6× compared with 7.4 in 100 for all vehicles first used in 2016
- Tyres4.0 in 100 tests0.6× compared with 6.6 in 100 for all vehicles first used in 2016
- Windscreen, wipers, mirrors3.1 in 100 tests0.9× compared with 3.5 in 100 for all vehicles first used in 2016
- Brakes2.8 in 100 tests0.6× compared with 5.0 in 100 for all vehicles first used in 2016
- Noise, emissions, leaks1.8 in 100 tests0.7× compared with 2.4 in 100 for all vehicles first used in 2016
- Body, chassis, structure1.2 in 100 tests– no reliable figure for all vehicles first used in 2016
All vehicles first used in 2016: the 245 models in our data, 2,632,483 tests (98.1% of all 2,684,065 tests on vehicles first used in 2016). Areas with fewer than 50 failures in a model aren't published, so an area is only compared when that leaves the all-vehicles figure at most 10% short; otherwise it shows –.
What MOT data can't tell you about any 2016 Nissan Note
Outstanding finance, write-offs, theft and plate changes aren't in MOT records. For a particular car, you need a history check.
Compare history checksWhat MOT history doesn't show